CJI Gogoi case: Mystery deepens over ex-SC staffer’s boycott of inquiry

 

CJI_R
Justice Ranjan Gogoi, Chief Justice of India

As the former woman employee of the Supreme Court, who has accused Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi of sexual misconduct, walked out of the in-house inquiry, more clarity on the forces, pulling the strings behind the complainant seems to be emerging.

Apart from pleading on hearing impairment, health condition, fear and nervousness without her lawyer before the inquiry panel, etc., the complainant has listed four main reasons for her decision, which are reproduced below:

  • I have not been allowed to have the presence of my lawyer/support person despite my impaired hearing, nervousness and fear
  • There being no video or audio recording of the Committee proceedings
  • I have not been supplied even a copy of my statement as recorded on 26th and 29th April 2019
  • I was not informed about the procedure this committee is following.

But the truth may be hidden elsewhere in her long press release, some excerpts from which are given below:

“…..on 26th April 2019, the Judges in the committee told me that this was neither an in-house committee proceeding, nor a proceeding under the Vishakha Guidelines and that it was an informal proceeding….

“I was orally instructed that I should not disclose the proceedings of the committee to the media and was to not even share the proceedings with my lawyer Advocate Vrinda Grover….

“In the hearing that followed on the 29th April, I was again not allowed to have a lawyer/support person present with me. I was repeatedly asked by the committee as to why I had made this complaint of sexual harassment so late. I found the atmosphere of the committee very frightening and I was very nervous because of being confronted and questioned by three Supreme Court Judges and without even the presence of my lawyer/support person.

“… I went for the hearing on the 30th April with a written letter where I once again explained why I made my complaint of sexual harassment after several months…

“I was told that there were certain questions on facts that they wanted me to answer. I declined to participate any further in the absence of my lawyer/support person. The committee also asked me if I wanted to present any witnesses. I informed them that almost all the witnesses are working in the Supreme Court of India and there is no likelihood of them being able to depose fearlessly before the committee….

“I have not been informed if the committee has sought any response from the CJI to my complaint and I have been left guessing and anxious on all these matters….”

This is the version of the complainant about the hearing. But nobody knows what really transpired there as the other side is not yet revealed.

Apparently, those who are pulling the strings are realizing that the case won’t go their way with an in-house inquiry (and the CJI is still on the high chair). Times of India quoted the complainant as saying “Please don’t forget that I belong to the Scheduled Caste and therefore challenges to achieve something in life is much more daunting” while putting forward her demands before the inquiry panel.

Certainly, the next move of the string pullers is something people would keenly watch for.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.